In the case of a "pre-sale" inspection, the Inspector should be told the EXACT PURPOSE for the inspection by the Seller and/or the Seller's Agent.
A mis-understanding in purpose can have catastrophic affects for the Seller, the Seller's Agent and the Inspector if suggestion and omission magic meant to provide a false peace of mind calms a Seller into believing he has a home that is far more ready for market than it really is.
SCENARIO 1 -- The inspection is for the "seller's information" so the seller can gain an honest understanding of their home for repair, pricing or marketing purposes
SCENARIO 2 -- The inspection is for the "seller's marketing purposes", in which case the inspector will gloss over things to the same lessor or greater degree they may do if they were doing a soft buyer's inspection. The goal? Provide an initial first impression to a buyer that the home is "in pretty good shape" even if that is far less than forthcoming.
Suggestion and Omission magic has a very nasty back channel when the EXACT PURPOSE of the inspection is not understood between the Seller, the Inspector and the Seller's Agent. Magic meant to work on the buyers may accidentally be inflicted on others and the "POOF" up comes the curtain with nary a stitch of clothing to hide the genitalia.
NOTE about #1:
If the inspection is for #1, the best way to do that is likely with a "consultation" with a Home Inspector and it would be best if only the Home Owner or someone that is going to help them with the work be there. Having the Seller's Agent that can and will jeopardize their ability to stay neutral in the event they learn of property problems the seller decides not to repair or disclosure properly. The "consultation" is the right way to go, because if you ask the Inspector to write it all down, that becomes a written document that you may get in deep water for not sharing as part of the disclosure process when you are ready to list the home.
NOTE about #2:
If the inspector glosses over inspection items for the same reason they all do, the inspector better hope and pray that the buyer is not slammed into a transaction where they were forced to waive their standard buyer's inspection and rely on a glossy overlay for a decision. While that may have worked for the past few decades, that shit is going to get very painful one of a half dozen ways in the very near future, if not just karmically alone. And every one of you knows exactly what I'm talking about..
If the inspector has been hired to do a pre-sale home inspection for someone interested in selling the home, the Inspector, the Agent and the Home Owner need to be on the same page. It's imperative they are on the same page or else something like I just experienced can happen and it's going to get so ugly it's beyond silly...
As unethical as this sounds , if a Seller or Seller's Agent doesn't do the following with clarity with a Home Inspector, the Seller can end up in a world of hurt if the Buyer's inspector is in on the game, or worse yet, the Buyer is a Contractor buying the home for his own residence...